happy together

India's Supreme Court refuses to legalize same-sex marriage, says it is up to govt_我的网站

影视风云路

A | 在2019年北美车展上，英菲尼迪推出了一款名为QX灵感的概念车，这是第一款专为纯电动汽车设计的概念车。在此之前，英菲尼迪的所有设计都可以与燃料发动机相匹配，而QX灵感只能与电动机和电池相匹配。 NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。是的，英菲尼迪的电动汽车时代即将到来。

B | 高端的英菲尼迪并没有将QX灵感的参数置于死地，而是意味着概念车的布局可以适应四轮驱动配置和高性能电池组，其中每个轴可以配备一个电机，以实现普通燃料车无法想象的线性加速。当然，这一说法也意味着四轮驱动必须是可选的顶部匹配配置，而QX灵感的入门版仍然是主要驱动。纯电动汽车布局的使用也意味着QX灵感本身会得到一个非常大的内部空间，英菲尼迪说，通过缩短不再存在的发动机舱，他们为汽车增加了无与伦比的额外空间。超大空间，豪华内饰。英菲尼迪QX灵感内饰采用非常高规格的设计，包括大理石覆盖的中央控制平台，棕色和白色皮革装饰方向盘和面板，以及绒面钻石装饰地板，所有这些通常用于高端家具面料。此外，QX灵感还显示了未来互联技术的可能性，如超大液晶仪表板和嵌入方向盘的显示屏。大气灯还结合了流行的RGB元素，根据不同的环境光的使用，这是相当流行的。QX灵感旨在探索纯电动汽车未来的发展方向。

C | 例如，日产的Propilot自动驾驶技术可以支持方向盘、刹车和油门踏板自动接受、座椅自动旋转30度，以实现人机交互时真正无人驾驶。许多设计的QX灵感也开始与室内空间，装饰和互动。

D | 日产聆风的经验最终将以英菲尼迪QX为灵感付诸实践。简而言之，任何豪华的纯电动汽车都可以用更多的钱为您制造。目前，英菲尼迪QX的灵感并未具体说明何时量产，但由于保时捷、梅赛德斯-奔驰、福特、奥迪和特斯拉已经拥有了自己的纯电动SUV，如果没有进一步的行动，在未来两年占领新市场将为时已晚。正因为如此，QX灵感的设计与量产模式非常接近。